Friends With Benefits

Posted by Michael Parsons on July 22, 2011 in / No Comments


(This review was originally published on July 22, 2011 at The Rogers Revue)

When a film taps into a recurring theme like the fabled existence of complication-free ‘relations’, it stands to reason that aspects of its script would appear like faded remnants of rom-coms in the past. These days it’s hard  to talk about anything relevant to modern sexuality and relationships without inadvertently naming a handful of clichéd movie titles, and you’d think that “Friends With Benefits” would be no exception. Surprisingly, it is.

7817900Instead of eschewing this notion of rehashing a trite premise, director (and co-writer) Will Gluck embraces the traits of romantic stereotypes and creates an uncomplicated if not self-aware comedy about two twenty-somethings pursuing a ‘physically exclusive’ arrangement in New York City. Dylan (Justin Timberlake), an ambitious art director working in Los Angeles, is flown out to New York by Jamie (Mila Kunis), a high level corporate headhunter, to interview for a coveted position at GQ. When Dylan is offered the job but still not sold on making the transition, Jamie wins his favor with a ‘non-touristy’ night out in Manhattan, finally convincing him to sign the one year contract with her client. As the two develop a friendship and begin to commiserate about their romantic shortcomings, the platonic element of their relationship inevitably collapses (under the flimsy analogy that sex would be “just like playing tennis”), and so is spawned the title of the movie.

Timberlake, who vehemently disagrees with the rom-com stigma attached to the film, plays the role of Dylan to the affable tone of a Ryan Reynolds character, comfortably walking the line of his ‘emotional unavailability’ without falling into the shallow trappings of the typical single male go-getter. Kunis tempers her co-stars blossoming comic prowess with an equally quick wit, balancing Jamie’s emotional baggage with her intrepid spirit and determination as they vow not to break their fragile pact. The characters actively avoid the clichés that they denounce in the movies, ultimately undermining the very stereotypes that would otherwise be bestowed upon them, freeing them up for some genuinely funny dialogue.

Justin Timberlake,Mila Kunis

This is a film that benefits from its simplicity, a cumulative effort by the writers to focus on dialogue and minimize clever plot developments. Keith Merryman, David A. Newman and director Will Gluck  (who wrote the screenplay from a story by Merryman, Newman and Harley Peyton) have managed to create a solid enough framework with a few extraneous scenes about midway through its 109 minute running time. Gluck’s banter-style of writing, which is exemplified best by the short lived TV series “The Loop”(2006), was tailored for its two main characters who would resemble something of a throwback to the 1940s if not for the subject matter.

The supporting cast ranges from Jamie’s slightly overplayed and verbose hippie mother (Patricia Clarkson) to Dylan’s sweet but troubled father, played by Richard Jenkins in a pivotal role that really keeps the final third of the movie grounded. Jenna Elfman is a pillar as Dylan’s sister, his emotional conduit and confidant. Woody Harrelson plays the ‘alpha male’ at Dylan’s office, a gay veteran sports writer who doles out equal parts sage advice and indiscriminate sexual innuendo. His screen time is appropriately limited, but he’s fitting as a comic sidebar and full of the type of colorful euphemisms that assist in steering the story away from potential romantic pitfalls.

Despite its flaws, this is a well paced film that delivers some memorably funny moments, including a hilarious breakup scene in the opening with brief appearances by Emma Stone (“Easy A”) and Andy Samberg (SNL), as well as an unconscious victim of a black light pen, a scary run-in with Olympic snowboarder Shaun White and a flash mob in Times Square. Kudos also to Nolan Gould, who has a stand out role as Dylan’s extremely polite, magic-obsessed nephew.

While its scope isn’t much broader than that of standard date night fare, it’s an example for subsequent efforts that revisiting a hackneyed story line can just as easily result in a fresh perspective. “Friends With Benefits” is driven by comic dialogue and garnished with the undertones of family and relationship issues, avoiding the genre epithets that befall so many films with similar premises. Though it’s ‘R’ rating is not abused with the pervasive elements that are  commonplace this summer, it allows for some uninhibited moments that play out with hilarious feasibility while remaining in the realm of actual human nature.

Posted in

Michael Parsons

Father. Realtor®. Movie nut. After pestering my parents for their commentary on “Star Wars” when I was four years old, my mind went into a creative frenzy. I’d imagined something entirely different than the actual film, which I didn’t end up seeing until its 1979 re-release at the Uptown Theater in Washington, DC. This was my formal introduction to the cinema.

During that long wait, which felt like an eternity to a child, my mind was being molded by more corrosive stuff like “Trilogy of Terror” and “Rosemary’s Baby”, most of which I’d conned various babysitters into letting me watch on television ( I convinced one poor lady that “Jaws” was actually “Moby Dick”).

The folks were pretty strict in that regard, so the less appropriate it was for a kid to watch, the more I was fascinated by it. Horror staples like “Halloween” and “Friday the 13th”, as well as lesser-known low-budget fare like “Madman”, “Sleepaway Camp” and “Pieces” all ended up sneaking their way into the VHS on a regular basis.

Since then, I’ve developed an obsession with the entire film industry. Even though I watch and review a wide breadth of films these days, my appreciation for the campy, poorly lit micro-budgeters still lends itself to my evolving perspective on movies just as much as the summer blockbusters and Oscar contenders. As I recall my trips to the movie theater, I realize that this stuff is about much more than just a fleeting piece of entertainment.

A couple years ago, I was finally given the opportunity to lend my opinion on films to a publication, The Rogers Revue, with a subsequent run at Reel Film News. It's been both a privilege and a gateway to what we’re doing now. Most of my experience has come from interviewing independent filmmakers, who consistently promote innovation. The filmmaking process is grueling and relatively unforgiving.

Fellow film enthusiast Eddie Pasa and I have created DC Filmdom as a medium for film reviews, discussion, and (inevitably) some debate. And so, the creative frenzy continues.

(Michael is a member of the Washington, DC Area Film Critics Association).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *