Review: “Toni Erdmann”

Posted by Michael Parsons on January 26, 2017 in / No Comments


German filmmaker Maren Ade likes to let her characters…. marinade. At nearly three hours, “Toni Erdmann” is something of an anomaly. An epic study  in unabashed, arid humor, it debunks any notion that German comedy is an oxymoron. Maybe because it takes place in Romania. Did I mention that it’s almost three hours long?

I was not familiar with writer/producer/director Ade until “Erdmann”. Peter Simonischek plays Winfried, a practical joking father who tries to resuscitate the tenuous relationship with workaholic daughter Ines (Sandra Hüller) via his titular alter ego. If dad jokes are embarrassing, then  Simonischek is the Al Pacino of awkward, “Erdmann”  the stonewashed jeans of films. Whoopee cushions, false teeth, wigs… the actor has it down to a science.

With such props, the Erdmann character is too obvious to appear anything other than a gag…. you’d think. Ines is a consultant for a big oil firm, working in Bucharest with hopes of relocating to Singapore. She’s in the midst of securing an extension on their toni-erdmann-postercurrent contract, jumping on the grenade for CEO  Henneberg (Michael Wittenborn) by proposing unpopular outsourcing solutions so that  he doesn’t have to, when dad shows up unannounced.

He’s as  tender as veal compared to rigid Ines, an amicable teddy bear who quietly mourns the recent passing of his dog. Ines invites him along to a business event, with specific instructions on what he can and cannot say. It pains Winfried to watch his daughter cater to the chauvinistic oil mogul and his clueless trophy wife, an internal wincing that Simonischek somehow makes visible to his audience.

Perhaps this justifies his wretched disguise. After all, dads do sometimes know best.  Winfried pretends to leave after overstaying his welcome, but re-emerges in the Erdmann get-up when Ines is out to dinner with friends, pretending to be a life coach of a vague nature.

Simonischek’s straight-faced commitment to the Erdmann ruse is so steadfast it’s painful. I believe it was Jim Carrey who once said that there’s a fine line between eye contact and the piercing stare of a psychopath; if I didn’t already know better, I might have thought a stalker movie was in the works. Somehow, though, the hulking Erdmann,   with his Igor teeth and ridiculous toupee, manages to infiltrate Ines’ professional life, with good intent but nonetheless to its temporary detriment.

Like the tide going out to reveal a hermit crab out of its shell, Ade’s finale exposes her characters literally and figuratively (Thomas Loibl is noteworthy as Ines’ deadpan boss, Gerald, likewise is Ingrid Bisu as her assistant). Despite what I’ve just described (and the manufactured flatulence),“Toni Erdmann” is about as far from slapstick as one could be without exiting the genre entirely. The pranks become part of this unusual bonding experience, the delicate and very strange evolution of a fractured father/daughter relationship.

Opens in Washington, DC on January 27th

—M. Parsons 2017


Posted in

Michael Parsons

Father. Realtor®. Movie nut. After pestering my parents for their commentary on “Star Wars” when I was four years old, my mind went into a creative frenzy. I’d imagined something entirely different than the actual film, which I didn’t end up seeing until its 1979 re-release at the Uptown Theater in Washington, DC. This was my formal introduction to the cinema.

During that long wait, which felt like an eternity to a child, my mind was being molded by more corrosive stuff like “Trilogy of Terror” and “Rosemary’s Baby”, most of which I’d conned various babysitters into letting me watch on television ( I convinced one poor lady that “Jaws” was actually “Moby Dick”).

The folks were pretty strict in that regard, so the less appropriate it was for a kid to watch, the more I was fascinated by it. Horror staples like “Halloween” and “Friday the 13th”, as well as lesser-known low-budget fare like “Madman”, “Sleepaway Camp” and “Pieces” all ended up sneaking their way into the VHS on a regular basis.

Since then, I’ve developed an obsession with the entire film industry. Even though I watch and review a wide breadth of films these days, my appreciation for the campy, poorly lit micro-budgeters still lends itself to my evolving perspective on movies just as much as the summer blockbusters and Oscar contenders. As I recall my trips to the movie theater, I realize that this stuff is about much more than just a fleeting piece of entertainment.

A couple years ago, I was finally given the opportunity to lend my opinion on films to a publication, The Rogers Revue, with a subsequent run at Reel Film News. It's been both a privilege and a gateway to what we’re doing now. Most of my experience has come from interviewing independent filmmakers, who consistently promote innovation. The filmmaking process is grueling and relatively unforgiving.

Fellow film enthusiast Eddie Pasa and I have created DC Filmdom as a medium for film reviews, discussion, and (inevitably) some debate. And so, the creative frenzy continues.

(Michael is a member of the Washington, DC Area Film Critics Association).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *